- Zeller - An international investigation into O red blood cell unit administration in hospitals.pdf (303k)
Author(s)
- Zeller, Michelle P.
- Barty, Rebecca
- Aandahl, Astrid
- Apelseth, Torunn Oveland
- Callum, Jeannie
- Dunbar, Nancy M.
- Elahie, Allahna
- Garritsen, Henk
- Hancock, Helen
- Kutner, José Mauro
- Manukian, Belinda
- Mizuta, Shuichi
- Okuda, Makoto
- Pagano, Monica B.
- Pogłód, Ryszard
- Rushford, Kylie
- Selleng, Kathleen
- Sørensen, Claess Henning
- Sprogøe, Ulrik
- Staves, Julie
- Weiland, Thorsten
- Wendel, Silvano
- Wood, Erica M.
- Watering, Leo van de
- Wordragen-Vlaswinkel, Maria van
- Ziman, Alyssa
- Zwaginga, Jaap Jan
- Murphy, Michael F.
- Heddle, Nancy M.
- Yazer, Mark H.
Publication date
2017-08-25
Series/Report no
Transfusion;57(10)
Publisher
Wiley
Document type
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transfusion of group O blood to non-O recipients, or transfusion of D- blood to D+ recipients, can result in shortages of group O or D- blood, respectively. This study investigated RBC utilization patterns at hospitals around the world and explored the context and policies that guide ABO blood group and D type selection practices. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study on transfusion data from the 2013 calendar year. This study included a survey component that asked about hospital RBC selection and transfusion practices and a data collection component where participants submitted information on RBC unit disposition including blood group and D type of unit and recipient. Units administered to recipients of unknown ABO or D group were excluded. RESULTS: Thirty-eight hospitals in 11 countries responded to the survey, 30 of which provided specific RBC unit disposition data. Overall, 11.1% (21,235/191,397) of group O units were transfused to non-O recipients; 22.6% (8777/38,911) of group O D- RBC units were transfused to O D+ recipients, and 43.2% (16,800/38,911) of group O D- RBC units were transfused to recipients that were not group O D-. Disposition of units and hospital transfusion policy varied within and across hospitals of different sizes, with transfusion of group O D- units to non-group O D- patients ranging from 0% to 33%. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of group O and D- RBC units were transfused to compatible, nonidentical recipients, although the frequency of this practice varied across sites.
Keywords
Version
acceptedVersion
Permanent URL (for citation purposes)
- https://hdl.handle.net/10642/7266